A granular
semiotics originating from L. Zadeh and independently from B. Rieger
is interpreted in terms of quantum complementarity: It can be also
obtained from the classical Saussure scheme if the signified and the
signifier are complementary to each other. Consequently, the “twins”
of language and reality are merged into a single ontology of quanta,
which can be interpreted complementarily either as “words” (i.e.
units of meanings in the language) or as “things” (i.e. units of
reality).
Furthermore that granular semiotics can
be formalized by the standard formalism of quantum mechanics and
information in Hilbert spaces whether non-entangled (and thus
equivalent to a single one) or entangled.
The language in terms of ontological
quanta abandons and darkens absolutely all dividing human beings.
They might be called invariant to the different intellect and
experience of the humans. The linguistic “atoms” are able to
concentrate only on a few unifying features of reality as their
meaning. Those linguistic units are live beings fed by consensus and
therefore created to search for it and find its “deposits”.
Consequently the language is a map of treasures of consensus
elaborated by living linguistic “cells”. The ontological quanta
are those “living words” fed by consensus creating the map of
reality as the locations of its deposits.
The sense of any meaning consists in
the optimal proportion between its unclearness and exactness. The
existence of ontological quanta forces the picture to be granular in
principle. The indivisibility of the ontological quanta is necessary
and fruitful condition for them to behavior as living searching for
deposits of consensus. The ontological quanta are bigger, the picture
is grainier, but the attraction between the quanta is stronger and
the deposits of consensus are more visible. They are living and
moving thus re-outlining new deposits of consensus, i.e. new
meanings.
Key words: Zadeh, Rieger, granular
semiotics, ontological quanta, quantum semiotics
No comments:
Post a Comment